Hotel officials say latest official timeline of Las Vegas shooting ‘not accurate’

Published on Oct 12, 2017 by the News Edition YouTube channel – Hotel officials say latest official timeline of Las Vegas shooting is ‘not accurate’.

WND Article below gives details –

Owner of Vegas hotel rejects police timeline of mass shooting

Statement adds more confusion to already bizarre case

MGM Resorts, the company that owns the Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino where 58 people were killed and nearly 500 injured at a country music concert nearly two weeks ago, issued a statement Thursday afternoon discounting the new timeline of the shooting spree given by police earlier this week.

MGM says time police are reporting Stephen Paddock shot security guard Jesus Campos is “not accurate” and indicated that it believes the mass shooting started earlier.

“Although we prefer not to comment on the details of the investigation, we are issuing this statement to correct some of the misinformation that has been reported,” said the statement emailed to the Las Vegas Journal Review.

Lombardo said in a Monday press conference that the Mandalay Bay security guard Jesus Campos was shot at 9:59 p.m., about six minutes before a gunman turned his weapons on the Route 91 Harvest festival crowd, killing 58 and leaving nearly 500 wounded.

“The 9:59 p.m. PDT time was derived from a Mandalay Bay report manually created after the fact without the benefit of information we now have,” the statement continued. “We are now confident that the time stated in this report is not accurate. We know that shots were being fired at the festival lot at the same time as, or within 40 seconds after, the time Jesus Campos first reported that shots were fired over the radio.”

So many questions about the case remain unanswered, not the least of which is Paddock’s motive and how he was able to pull off the worst mass shooting in modern U.S. history.

Paddock lugged 23 weapons and thousands of rounds of ammunition up to his room over a three-day period, filling 13 suitcases.

Police have repeatedly said they remain stumped as to why Paddock, a man with no criminal history and no known political or religious ideology, would commit such a heinous act.


Read the entire article at

(If you share this article with our sharing tools below, the above image will appear with the link.)

UCI Comments - join the discussion!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: